What is the writer's main point in the text? — Some moderation is necessary, but the line between it and censorship is genuinely hard to draw
Why does the writer say that some moderation is "a condition of" free speech rather than its enemy? — Because a conversation dominated by the cruellest voices is not really free
According to the text, why are moderation mistakes "inevitable"? — Because the rules are written under pressure and enforced at scale by software that misses context
